Week 7 Prompt Response

 Of the various novels named in Louis Menand’s article, “Literary Hoaxes and the Ethics of Authorship,” I was only familiar with two: James Frey’s A Million Little Pieces – from another class – and Go Ask Alice. Initially published as anonymous, Beatrice Sparks later claimed authorship of Go Ask AliceJay’s Journal, and many other books, often labeled as ‘diaries.’ Although this class focuses on adult patrons and novels for adults, and although Beatrice Sparks’ books were, and are, geared toward young adults, young adult novels still appeal to adults, regardless of age. Specifically, I want to discuss further the quote from Menand’s article, which states, “[t]he real author has not been conclusively established, but the copyright belonged to a Mormon therapist who claimed that she had merely edited a real Alice’s diary, which was under lock and key at the publisher’s” (Menand, 2018). I found an interesting article from 1979 in the School Library Journal, an article recounting an interview Alleen Pace Nilsen had with Beatrice Sparks about her book, Go Ask Alice, how the plot originated, why Sparks wrote it, and what qualifications she had as the author. According to Nilsen, despite marketing herself as a therapist, during the interview, Sparks provided no concrete “evidence of formal training or professional affiliation” (Nilsen, 1979, p. 110). Perhaps most problematic is that Go Ask Alice was based loosely on the life and death of “talk-show host Art Linkletter’s daughter Diane, [who,] barely 21, died by suicide in 1969 . . .” (Onion, 2022). However, Sparks’ book, Jay’s Journal, is even more damaging. 

As for Menands’ article and demonstrating the damage authorship under false pretenses, so to speak, can cause, I think Sparks’ book, Jay’s Journal, is a better representation of this type of harm. According to a Slate article written by Rebecca Onion, which, while admittedly, not the most credible—to clarify, I found few scholarly articles about Sparks or her works; if I had, I would have used them in my response—does incorporate other sources to bolster its argument. For example, Onion quotes Rick Emerson’s book, Unmask Alice: LSD, Satanic Panic, and the Imposter Behind the World’s Most Notorious Diaries, explaining that “Sparks used two dozen entries from Alden’s diary and then added 190 . . .” (Onion, 2022). Sparks’ choice to create a false narrative “was, for Alden’s family, catastrophic. They were ostracized in their town, and Alden’s gravestone was desecrated and stolen; the parents divorced, and the rest of the family scattered, leaving their community behind” (Onion, 2022). In response to Sparks’ work, Alden’s brother wrote a book called A Place in the Sun (Cep, 2022). His book about his brother, Alden, “reproduces images and transcripts of all the entries in Alden’s actual diary” (Onion, 2022). While Emerson provides valuable information for the reader in his book, an article from The New Yorker (also not the most credible source), critiques Emerson’s work as “dramatizing scenes and what he calls “inner monologues” without clear editorial markers or consistent sourcing” (Cep, 2022). 

References:

Cep, C. (2022, July 25). How a Mormon housewife turned a fake diary into an enormous best-seller. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/08/01/how-a-mormon-housewife-turned-a-fake-diary-into-an-enormous-best-seller

Menand, L. (2018, December 3). Literary hoaxes and the ethics of authorship. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/12/10/literary-hoaxes-and-the-ethics-of-authorship

Nilsen, A. P. (1979). School Library Journal26(2), 109.

 

Onion, R. (2022, August 2). The gothic fantasies of Beatrice Sparks. Slate. https://slate.com/culture/2022/08/go-ask-alice-why-a-mormon-mom-made-up-stories-of-teen-drugs-that-swept-america.html

 

 

Comments

  1. You talk about how this book is loosely based on a a real woman but so much of her real story is altered and faked that it makes you look at the author in a different light. Do you think that effects the message of the book that the author is trying to share in her story? The book itself goes over drug use in teens and how they deal with it, a difficult talk that many parents hope they never have to deal with. Would you try and use a different book to fill in the gap that this book is currently being use for that is fictional in nature but goes over drug use in teens and how they may view it and try to cope with using it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Becca,

      You make a good point about the difficulty of discussing substance use, particularly parents talking to their children about it. In the New Yorker article I quoted initially, Cep says that Beatrice Sparks “seems to have had a genuine conviction that young people in crisis needed adults to do more to understand them” (Cep, 2022). However, Cep states this ideology is “smothered by anti-drug and pro-abstinence propaganda” (Cep, 2022) woven throughout the book. Considering this quote, the information gleaned from the articles I read, and the liberties Sparks’ admitted to having taken with real-life Alice’s story, I believe the author’s falsification negatively affected the message or moral of the story because all these factors combined suggest that Sparks seemingly did not write this book to tell the protagonist’s story with compassion, instead, creating elaborate scenarios meant to be used as “scare tactics” (Cep, 2022). I do not fully agree with Cep’s claim about Sparks’ ideology about parenting. However, I agree that substance use is an important topic parents should discuss with their children and that books, fiction, and nonfiction, when done correctly and truthfully, can address these issues in a way that makes an impact. Had Go Ask Alice been a memoir, I do not think I would supplement it with a different fictional text. Yet, because Go Ask Alice was a fabrication, in addition to emphasizing and re-emphasizing the fictionality of Sparks’ book, I think it would be valuable to add to the reading. However, rather than a fictional text, I would include a nonfiction text, a truly autobiographical novel written by Nic Sheff, entitled, Tweak: Growing Up on Methamphetamines. I cannot find any evidence that Sheff’s book was a fabrication, nor any controversy surrounding the book sixteen years after its release.

      References:

      Cep, C. (2022, July 25). How a Mormon housewife turned a fake diary into an enormous best-seller. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/08/01/how-a-mormon-housewife-turned-a-fake-diary-into-an-enormous-best-seller

      Delete
  2. Wow, I hadn't heard of "Jay's Journal." I went and read through the slate article you linked and was sickened to see how Sparks sensationalized Alden's life for her own publicity and aims. The amount of people who clearly believed her book and retaliated against the family is very sad as well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Lexi! I really appreciate the research you did for this post; it was extremely interesting to read! Though I knew prior to this week that Go Ask Alice was faked/dramatized, I did not know the full extent of the author's deceit. I had never heard of Jay's Journal prior to your post, and I am shocked at how much damage this author has caused in order to sell books. It's a little sickening. In your research, did you happen to see if the author ever owned up to the consequences of writing Jay's Journal?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Whoa, that Slate article was intense. Where was Beatrice Sparks's moral compass at any point during her publications? Did she have any clue what impact her lies could have on people? Really fascinating to read about, nicely done research.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm so glad you discussed Jay's Journal too! While not as infamous as Go Ask Alice - it was still immensely popular and immensely damaging to the family. Great prompt response!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts